Re: 93% OF ALL US NAVY SHIPS AT SEA!
Makes sense to me... I've read several articles that called this exercise 'operation blinding storm', and england's version was called 'operation urgent alliance'. So we have to ask, what's so urgent? what storm? and why blinding? And the need for large alliances?
(cut)
: but first, our assumptions: 1) navies put to sea when they
: expect severe weather;
(cut)
: 3) navies do *not* put to sea en masse for war, especially
: nuclear war (think about it, easy to find, and a few large
: nukes un voila, no collateral damage other than fishes, and
: no more navy);
: 4) the Fed forcing money into the system has a short term,
: limited effect, likely on the order of less than 2 months
: cycle time (money velocity through the system);
report
Complete thread:
- 93% OF ALL US NAVY SHIPS AT SEA! - Netking, 2004-06-15, 03:18
- Re: 93% OF ALL US NAVY SHIPS AT SEA! - starner, 2004-06-15, 08:18
![Show preview […]](templates/default/images/ajax_preview.png)
- Re: 93% OF ALL US NAVY SHIPS AT SEA! - anubis, 2004-06-15, 13:17
![Show preview […]](templates/default/images/ajax_preview.png)
- Re: 93% OF ALL US NAVY SHIPS AT SEA! - anubis, 2004-06-15, 13:17
- Re: 93% OF ALL US NAVY SHIPS AT SEA! - craneman, 2004-06-15, 08:23
- WHERE ARE THE CARRIERS? - Miker12, 2004-06-15, 11:57
![Show preview […]](templates/default/images/ajax_preview.png)
- Re: 93% OF ALL US NAVY SHIPS AT SEA! - starner, 2004-06-15, 08:18



