UPDATES ON SPITZER COMPLAINT AND ON THE U.L. AND RYAN

by WhiteHorseRider, Saturday, November 20, 2004, 00:15

I found this in my inbox just now, so I'm passing it right along.

==============================================================

Spitzer Complaint,
Ryan & 911Truth.org news

Nov. 19, 2004 Dear 9/11 Truth Seekers,

It's Friday and a lot is going on... here's the latest on "Justice for 9/11," the Kevin Ryan story, and developments at 911Truth.org: Justice for 9/11

The "Justice for 9/11" Coalition today filed a restated and amended Citizen's Complaint and Petition with the offices of Eliot Spitzer, the Attorney General of New York State, citing probable cause to convene a grand jury on unsolved crimes surrounding the events of September 11, 2001. See

<http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041119122358922>

(snip)

But the new Complaint is more comprehensive. The 30-page main text and 24 appendices represent much of the best in 9/11 research, if by no means all. These documents will be posted piece-by-piece at Justicefor911.org during the next few hours (okay, it might take until Monday morning before we have the whole thing up).

The PDF of the main text submitted to Spitzer is already there for the downloading.

<http://www.Justicefor911.org>

(snip)

The "Justice" site will later feature a page inviting you to add your own research, witness observations, and possible appendices for consideration in future submissions to Spitzer and other prosecuting attorneys by the "Justice for 9/11" coalition. We will have to vet all such material very carefully.

While you're checking it all out, please sign the electronic Petition of Solidarity at the "Justice" site, if you have not already done so, and get your friends on board!

We hope all this will serve as inspiration to those of you who live in the other 49 states to file similar complaints with your own Attorneys General and District Attorneys. One of the appendices deals with state jurisdictional matters. As you might guess, many states harbor actionable connections to the suspected 9/11 crime complex.

If the deceptions of 9/11 are ever to be tackled by the means of criminal investigation--cross your fingers and hope Spitzer has the courage and air cover!--then this will surely necessitate cooperation among state AGs, on the same model as the tobacco lawsuits or the Microsoft case.

Stand up and file one of these in your own state. We invite you to borrow from our approach, language and appendices and create your own complaints. In many cases, it will be as easy as filling in "California" for "New York" (that's a hint). Get in contact with us at 911Truth.org (write to david@911truth.org)

In about 10 days we will be holding a major New York press conference on the Complaint - and on an excellent new project we hope to announce next week!

The Kevin Ryan Story:

Update

Meanwhile, in other developments, as you know, Underwriters Laboratories last Tuesday (11/16) fired their executive, Kevin Ryan, site manager of the Environmental Health Laboratories. Ryan had written a letter doubting the fire-melts-steel theory to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which is due to release a draft of its final report on the WTC collapses early next year. The letter was originally published a week ago by the 9/11 Visibility Project at

<http://septembereleventh.org>,

and there was a follow-up story by 911Truth.org on Nov. 12:

<http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041112144051451>

Now here's the latest: UL asked us to publish a statement on Ryan's termination. We found this inadequate, and wrote back asking them to answer a few reasonable questions. They haven't yet, so since it's the end of the week, we are publishing both documents, here:

<http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041119123941493>

This story continues to develop and we will keep you posted. Kevin Ryan has been punished because he stood up for what he believes. The time may have come for you to let UL know what you think about all this.

The 9/11 Visibility Project will be sending out an action alert, but it's easy enough to figure out how to contact UL from their own statement for publication at the above URL. If you look around you, you can probably see a number of appliances with UL seals on them - for example, your telephone and your computer.

They are not just a (non-profit) corporation, they have a mission central to public safety, and they should be answerable to anyone who uses a light switch. It's hard to imagine a greater public safety issue than knowing the full truth about what might cause a skyscraper (or three) to collapse into a pile of dust.

(snip)

- 911Truth.org Staff (/nl)