MINSK 'AGREEMENT': OUTCOME DEPENDS ON THE EUROPEANS, NOT RUSSIA (STA BREAKING NEWS and ARCHIVES)

by Mother_Of_The_World , Thursday, February 12, 2015, 20:11

Of course the exact opposite is currently being parroted by The Mainscream Media: who like their Governmental/Corporate Overseers, are frantically & desperately trying to spin the Real Story so quickly & completely, that "The Sheeple" are not roused from their ongoing state of slumber!
_______________________________________________________________________________

Host Source: SIGNS OF THE TIMES

Minsk 'agreement': Outcome depends on the Europeans, not Russia

Alexander Mercouris
The Vineyard of the Saker
Thu, 12 Feb 2015 23:44 CET

Putin in Minsk.

Already there is debate about who has "won" and who has "lost" in the Minsk talks.

The short answer is that as the German foreign minister Steinmeier correctly said there is no breakthrough but the Russians and the NAF have made progress.

One point needs to be explained or reiterated (since I have explained it already and many times).

The agreement does not make provision for federalisation or autonomy for the Donbass but still only refers to the grant of a law according the Donbass temporary special status within the Ukraine.

There could not be an agreement for federalisation out of the Minsk negotiations because they are primarily a summit meeting of five powers - Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, German and France. The Russians have always insisted that this is an internal conflict and civil war within the Ukraine and between Ukrainians and it is for the Ukrainians and them alone to resolve their internal differences between them through negotiations.

Given that this is Russia's stance, Russia and the other powers cannot impose a federalisation scheme on the Ukrainians and they have not - at least overtly - sought to do so. What the stated objective of the Minsk talks is - at least from the Russian point of view - is to set up conditions and a process for the constitutional negotiations that the Russians have been pushing for (and which were supposedly agreed on 21st February 2014 and on 17th April 2014 and 5th September 2014) to take place.

The Russians have been insisting on these negotiations since the February coup. The Russians are not publicly pre-ordaining the outcome of those negotiations because were they to do so they would not be negotiations at all. Whatever a negotiation is, it is by definition not something whose outcome is preordained.

*SNIP*

FULL ANALYSIS:
http://www.sott.net/article/292543-Minsk-agreement-Outcome-depends-on-the-Europeans-not-Russia