CHARLIE HEBDO AND THE CASSIOPAEANS (STA BREAKING NEWS and ARCHIVES)

by Il_Bagattel, Monday, January 19, 2015, 10:13

The Cassiopaean forum has taken down all of the C's session transcripts on the advice of their French legal council. This was done after the arrests of the 54 French, including the comedian Dieudonné, for their remarks, social media posts and/or articles. France, it seems, has moved away from their strong position on Liberté.

The most recent session, after the Charlie Hebdo attack, contained some questions about it with some surprising responses. I have attached those below. You might find them interesting.

BEGIN SNIP

(L) Well, long ago, you once predicted that France would experience a nuclear attack...

A: Yes

Q: (L) Uh, is that kind of like back on the table now?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) Could that be natural in the form of an earthquake that causes some kind of a problem at a nuclear power station?

A: Not as likely as bringing on the fires of hell. France has chosen a very unwise direction.

Q: (Pierre) So meteorites impacting...

(L) I don't think they necessarily mean meteorites. That can be a metaphoric expression. Do you mean specifically meteorites?

A: !? Maybe

Q: (Joe) I mean, in the past session we talked about these drones over nuclear power plants in France, and that the French military would like to know who it is. The suggestion was that it was the Bad Guys.

(L) Has that been part of the blackmail process against France to get them to cooperate with this particular Charlie Hebdo event that just happened on Wednesday?

A: Yes

Q: (L) I guess we should get to that since that's what we've been concerned about. Is this Charlie Hebdo event a false flag operation?

A: Absolutely! All the signs are evident!

Q: (Pierre) And the motive, is it because of France's position on Russia? Is it because of France's position on Palestine...?

(L) Wait a minute, wait a minute, back up.

(Chu) What is the motive?

(L) Yeah, that's a fairly simple question. What is the motive?

A: To get France in line with Israel's survival mandate: Semites must be destroyed!

Q: (L) Basically, you're saying that Israelis are not Semitic, but Arabs for the most part are. Is that what you're saying?

A: Yes

Q: (Pierre) So, the objective is the destruction of Arabic population in France through a civil war?

(L) I would say so, because if you've got the destruction of the Arabic population in France, then there is no support [from outside] for the Arabic people around Israel [and they can be more easily destroyed]. Israel just wants to claim all that land – Eretz Israel, they call it.

A: Yes

Q: (Pierre) Destruction through civil war?

A: Expulsion, camps, similar to the treatment of the Semitic Jews by the Nazis, supported or ignored by the rest of the world.

Q: (Pierre) That's exactly what this guy Eric Zemmour, the guy who was on every French TV show, was announcing on air. He was announcing that Arabic population because they are a source of chaos should be deported. There was this big controversy around what he said. Actually, it was priming the French population to what is going to happen.

(Scottie) I think I know what the Disturbance in the Force is.

(L) What?

(Scottie) Remember I was telling you the other day that something was up? This seems like a pretty big disturbance in the Force, dontcha think?

(L) Yeah!

(Scottie) It was like a day or two before the Charlie Hebdo thing that I mentioned it.

(L) Oh yeah.

(Scottie) People here were feeling squirrelly, couldn't sleep, having headaches, bad dreams and all that stuff. Something was clearly "off"... And then: KABOOM!

(Anna) It's sickening.

(Pierre) Will they succeed?

A: They may achieve some progress in their plans. However they should consider the cost: We also mentioned long ago a major event in Israel.

Q: (Pierre) So, they will start to implement this plan, and then in Israel there will be such a chaos and destruction that the leaders or the bosses will disappear, and...

(L) No, you're... I mean, just think about it. Okay, they start this plan. I think that at some point, obviously... Well, I think that some leadership within the Arabic world is going to change their mind about their support of Israel and do - what do they call it? A decapitating movement, where they cut off the head of the opposition. Is that close? That's kind of what I got in my head here when the answer was coming through.

A: Very close, but more was implied than just human activities.

Q: (Joe) When they talk about a major event a long time ago, I think it was in reference to an earthquake. You had mentioned something like there was a fault line under Israel. But maybe it's in reference to what they said previously, which was that events on the surface have effects on the planet. There may be some direct link there...

(L) So Israel is turning itself into its own vortex.

(Joe) The more they destroy, the more they bring on the day where the planet will respond and destroy Israel. You're meant to live in harmony with the planet and everything on it. If you're a chief evildoer...

(L) And if France is supporting this, it will probably suffer some collateral damage, at least...

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) Ya know there's a nuclear power plant close to where we live.

(L) Yes, I know.

(Chu) And the Toulouse people are most aligned with this whole Israel thing according to the news today.

(Joe) The two brothers in the Charlie Hebdo shooting, the two brothers, were they the shooters?

A: No. [Wood stove bottom door falls open, making a big noise] They were already "on ice."

Q: (Joe) Does that mean they were already dead?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) So, um...

(Chu) And the third guy, too?

(Joe) So they were already dead. Were they placed in this print house near Paris? Were their bodies put in that building?

A: This was a multi-act drama.

Q: (L) When they supposedly killed the brothers and took them out, were they displayed?

(Chu) Not at all. Nothing was displayed.

(L) Did anybody see their faces?

(Chu) No.

(Pierre) No.

(Niall) No.

(L) Do we even know that they were dead when they were supposedly shot and taken out?

(Joe) No, nobody knows that. You never know that anyway.

(Pierre) The only thing you know about them is their names, and pictures of them.

(Joe) Lemme ask a question: Was there anybody in that print house playing the part of these brothers?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) So there were some "actors" there playing the part?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) Were they killed?

A: No

Q: (Joe) They escaped, or they were arrested? Were they arrested? Did anybody arrest them?

(Niall) They were wearing uniforms so they blended in.

(Pierre) Fake shootings.

(Chu) Were they RAID agents?

(L) What's RAID?

(Chu) The special agents that killed Merah. [RAID = Recherche Assistance Intervention Dissuasion, the anti-terrorist unit of the French Police]

A: Close.

Q: (L) Now, we need to get something straight here. We had a grocery store...

(Joe) Two brothers ended up in a print house north of Paris. The two brothers who supposedly shot up Charlie Hebdo...

(L) Okay, they were in the print shop.

(Joe) Another guy who supposedly was associated with them went to a Kosher grocery store in Paris and had hostages. Simultaneously, more or less, they raided both of them and killed all three of them.

(L) Okay, but nobody ever saw anybody being taken out, nobody ever saw any faces, so they could have just had actors in there who were...?

(Chu) Well, on the grocery store, you see one guy in the same kind of uniform as the special forces being shot.

(L) You assume you see him being shot.

(Joe) You don't see him being shot and dropping to the ground.

(Chu) So what about the third guy? Did he kill the police woman the first day?

A: No

Q: (Chu) Was he at the grocery store?

A: No

Q: (Joe) Who was the guy who took hostages in the grocery store?

A: Agent!

Q: (Chu) Was the third guy already killed a week ago like the brothers?

A: Not a week.

Q: (L) I would say they probably had them in custody and killed them right before...

(Pierre) They needed them fresh.

(Joe) And then they just present their bodies after the fact.

(Pierre) So this guy running out of the grocery, he wasn't shot.

(Joe) Exactly. That's why they froze the video. I dunno if they're shooting blanks, but one of the guys ran in on his own.

(Pierre) There was an agent inside.

(Joe) So they put the smoke in, and then the guy who was actually the hostage taker with the balaclava and stuff runs out, he's got more or less the same gear on as the rest of them, he mingles in the crowd, takes his balaclava off, and hey! I'm a cop! And nobody knows.

(Chu) Well, you see him kind of walk like the V for Vendetta scene where the guy says, "Don't shoot!", and you don't see the shot but he falls. Then a minute later, you see a body coming out and the news people are saying that the police are taking out a body.

(Pierre) So that guy running out of the Hypercacher store, did they kill him?

A: No

Q: (Chu) But the hostages have to have been real.

(Pierre) Oh yeah!

(L) You know what it makes me think of? Remember that incident down south near Toulouse where they had that shooting exercise, and it was supposed to be blanks, but it was live ammunition?

(Pierre) No, in Carcassonne.

(L) Yeah, that's it. It's almost like somewhere around they're practicing these kinds of things. They're training for these kinds of operations.

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) When you say "agents", are these people part of the French military or intelligence establishment?

A: Above that, connected to Mossad.

Q: (Joe) So it's like an Israeli or Mossad fifth column within the French intelligence services.

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) So most of the police involved with this...

(L) ...are innocent!

(Joe) Yeah, most of the police involved think that it's real!

A: Yes

Q: (Niall) How about that cop in Limoges that committed suicide?

(Joe) Before that, can we just clear up one thing? The policeman outside on the street on video, he was really shot?

A: Yes

Q: (L) So they really kill people. The killing of people is NOT fake!

A: Indeed!

Q: (Joe) This guy in Limoges who was 3rd in command in the Limoges Police Judiciare, immediately after the Charlie Hebdo affair, he was working on the case somehow even though Limoges is quite far away, and he apparently committed suicide. Did he?

(L) So, in other words, he was "suicided"?

A: Yes

Q: (Pierre) Because he was about to talk?

(L) Because he wasn't willing to participate in this charade...

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) A couple of years before in the same department in Limoges, this guy's predecessor, he also committed suicide, and it this guy who recently died that found him!

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) The guy who "committed suicide" a few days ago was the one who found his predecessor's body in the same department, who also supposedly committed suicide.

(Pierre) Did the predecessor really commit suicide?

A: No

Q: (Chu) What's going on in Limoges?

A: There is so much corruption at higher levels that the regular police have to work hard to remain "ignorant."

Q: (Joe) There's nowhere to look where you won't see something.

(L) And they need to remain ignorant to stay alive if they don't want to be part of it.

A: Yes

Q: (Niall) It's means the cops here are dangerous.

(L) Well, that's a given.

(Pierre) Some of them.

(L) Yeah, some of them. Some of them are IN danger. It's like anywhere.

(Pierre) Surrounded by corruption.

(L) Undoubtedly there are many cops in the job because it's a good job to have, and they want to serve.

(Joe) So, it's kind of a given then that Hollande and Manuel Valls and the people at that level don't know anything about this. They're not aware of the false flag nature of this attack. They think it's real. Is that true?

A: Only partly. They are scripted in their responses by "advisers."

Q: (Pierre) Well, it's very bad. Concentration camps, deportation...

(Joe) I don't think we'll get there, though.

(Chu) Were all the people that were allegedly killed at the Charlie Hebdo building, were they all actually killed?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) They kill real people.

(Chu) I was just wondering if the Jewish guy had survived.

A: One of the keys to Mossad involvement is that Jews die.

Q: (L) So they're very much into killing their own.

(Joe) Absolutely. So, kind of the lack of police on the streets and the ease of the getaway after the Charlie Hebdo thing, that was facilitated by these people who plotted the whole thing. They were able to keep police away.

(L) If they have fifth column type things, they can direct the traffic so to speak.

(Pierre) The police not answering the phone calls...

(L) You just get a key person here or there, and they just direct the traffic. Anything else?

(Ark) I have a question. Are we supposed to publish it all?

(L) Publish this session?

(Ark) Yes.

A: Why not?

Q: (L) Others are already saying it.

(Pierre) Yeah, they are already saying civil war, demonizing Jews for a false flag attack, Mossad business...

(Chu) They can try and sue the C's if they want to.

(Niall) The thing is, it's already been put out there.

(L) The C's aren't really saying anything that already hasn't been said by somebody else.

(Pierre) Well, I hope something will happen soon so this deportation business and that kind of thing doesn't happen soon. That's what I wish. It's terrible!

A: Help is on the way!

END SNIP

No belief required. Posted only for your consideration.