MOST CERTAINLY ODD WORDS USED! (STA BREAKING NEWS and ARCHIVES)

by pravdaseeker , Saturday, January 10, 2015, 20:00 @ Mother_Of_The_World

Dear STA Readers, Writers,

Hello MOTW, thanks again for posting this video.

I saw this video earlier, and my wife pointed it out to me.

WHY in the world would he use the word.."PUT"?

And in the original video, showing the policeman laying there.. There should have blood pooling and gathering around the man.

Any video I have seen of someone who has really been shot, as in by the police in the USA, there is an immediate pooling of blood, and, (GROSS), "usually" blood coming from the mouth of the gunshot victim. (Of course, this only applies to a chest wounding, and lung damage usually).

I have to admit that there is something not quite right about it all, not REAL. For the amount of time the policeman was laying on the ground up to the execution shot by the passing bad guy, there certainly should have been at least some blood visible on the sidewalk, yet NONE is seen.

Since the execution shot, was the final moment of this persons life, no body recoil as you mentioned in the first post, and no extreme flesh damage. From a shot that close, even the exiting "gases" from the shot will tear into someone laying there.

It certainly has transformed France overnight though. Whipped up by the media, etc. Now big demonstrations are planned against terrorism.

Funny that it is against "terrorism, and NOT mass immigration from a vastly different culture and society though. The people should be demonstrating against the mass immigration of people into their country. If Europe is so hurting from loss of jobs, etc.. Are NOT these masses of immigrants taking away jobs that could/should have gone to the long term resident citizens of that country?

It is NOT the "responsibility" of other countries to "take in" people from other lands, due to over population or economic strife in the foreign lands. To offer a refuge for war torn populations, and genocide is a different matter.

But ANY country should make it mandatory that ANY immigrant quickly assimilate into that society. To bring in a huge amount of people from "where ever" and allow them to carry on like it is a miniature of the country they came from is a recipe for trouble.

It has happened to almost all of the Euro nations. WHY? To allow massive social changes the elite wanted to get done in those countries? To somehow "force" societies to become more international? What fools, it does NOT work, never will. THAT is the reason borders and countries have existed forever in the first place!

It certainly gives the populations of these countries a diversion of fighting amongst themselves, instead of going after the elites who brought this mess to them by immigrating multiple thousands into their society.

For me, it is was EASY to move to Australia. It is similar to the country I came from. Same basic culture, or roots, so to speak. So NO huge culture or language, or religion changes. It is a society I LOVE, and WANT to assimilate myself into.

Imagining myself moving to an Arab nation for example, would be WAY outside my comfort zone, and present massive issues with trying to assimilate into that Arab society. The SAME must exist for those trying to move to a "western" country from an Arab nation. It is NOT a good match; and there MUST be some sort of mandatory transition skills taught and required.

I am not saying they can't continue in their religion of choice, but the instant it becomes radical or "out there"; they need to be considered for being sent back where they came from. Sorry.

To get back to the topic of this thread MOTW, here is another video showing what appears to be conflicting evidence, and possible fake things going on.

Pravdaseeker

---
ILLIGITIMI NON CARBORUNDUM

PRAVDASEEKER