POLL: DO YOU THINK FLIGHTS INTO US SHOULD BE BANNED DUE TO EBOLA? (STA BREAKING NEWS and ARCHIVES)

by Qwibqwib , Saturday, October 18, 2014, 08:40 @ Theresa
edited by Qwibqwib, Saturday, October 18, 2014, 08:59

Whether or not the borders are secured is now irrelevant, besides they will just bring the obola in on private jets anyway. They want IT here, so IT will be here. What IT is, of course, is a completely different topic. Is it the fear they want? The panic? or do they want the actual Ebola epidemic?

Is Ebola real? Indubitably yes. The proof is there to show there really is a virus called Ebola or EBV. People are contracting and dieing from this thing called Ebola and that is demonstrable. It is patented by the .gov, and that is also easily provable, although, apparently, the current strain is not patented. A gaggle search brings up the paperwork.

Is EBV airborne? It was shown to be airborne in a laboratory setting. The airborne thing is resolved, IMHO, arguments about the airborne qualities are mainly just semantics and hair splitting. There is rock solid scientific research showing a DEFINITE airborne spread (whether through fomites or various particles, etc is the hairsplitting) in non human primates and also from pigs to non human primates. There is also a lot of circumstantial evidence that it is or has become airborne. Like all the healthcare workers that have contracted the disease, for example. freiden would have us believe they ALL breached protocol, which is more unlikely than EBV being airborne.

Is EBV ravaging western Africa? Are the bodies piling up in the streets? How could we possibly know without firsthand knowledge? A quick search on goggle brings up the pix we all have already seen and nothing else. I have spent hours online looking for pix of the death and destruction, and have found none. All of the bodies are fairly clean looking with no pools of blood or other bodily fluids. There are no pictures, except some stock footage, of Ebola sufferers or the aftermath on a body. None of the dead bodies have sores or obvious deformations, and children are usually standing close by, gawking. Seems odd...

Next is the clipboard guy, the multiple regular cops at the pentagram, the camera guy in Atlanta, the pressure washer dudes, the judge, and the deputies in Texas. All of whom were not protected in any way, that is, these people were not wearing PPE and were definitely exposed. What gives? The uh-fici-al story is that clipboard guy was observing the Hazmat team to make sure they didn't make mistakes and to be their eyes and ears? Total BULLSHIT! Sorry, but that don't fly, something gives.

Do these gubbmint uh-fici-als know there is no threat and therefore are not worried about contracting EBV? Are they just 10 pounds worth of stoopid? Are they intended carriers/spreaders instructed by their master to sacrifice themselves?

What about the pentagram puker? Was she a suicidal jihadi puke bomb sent to the pentagram to infect the evil ones who reside therein? Did she just have a bad lobster last night? Is there any way we could know the answer to these questions? I'm all ears...

ps: don'tforget the foul mouthed youtuber pointing out the silly Spanish Montey Python style airplane unloading and transport of Spanish EBV victim. The guy in PPE saluting the ambulance, seems odd.

pps: Also don't forget the little boy who walks up to the camera and flops down right in front. By itself, it's meaningless and could actually represent a child suddenly having a seazure. The argument goes that there are lots of cameras in country and this one just so happened to be in the right place at the right time to capture the spontanious seazure. When coupled with everything else, it's just more circumstantial evidence.

ppps: What about the man and women dropping off their "son" EBV victim at the hospital? The "father" walks away with a wad of cash. Seems odd...(I think they are FRN's too)

---
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.
John Adams